Breaking News
World News
Who Actually Picks Iran’s Supreme Leader? Inside the Secretive Body That Chose Khamenei’s Son in Six Days
Quick Summary
When Ayatollah Ali Khamenei was killed in February 2026, Iran’s constitution triggered a process most Americans have never heard of: a secretive body of 88 clerics called the Assembly of Experts convened to choose his successor. That body selected Khamenei’s own son, Mojtaba, within roughly a week, despite his having no prior government experience and only mid-ranking religious credentials. As Iran holds its slain leader’s state funeral this week, this explainer breaks down how the country’s leadership succession system actually works, and why critics say it was never designed to be genuinely democratic.
What It Is
The Assembly of Experts is an 88-member body of Shia Islamic clerics, popularly elected by Iranian voters every eight years, whose sole constitutional function is to select, monitor, and, in theory, dismiss the country’s supreme leader. Article 111 of Iran’s constitution grants the assembly this authority, describing the supreme leader as removable if he becomes incapable of fulfilling his duties or is found to lack the required qualifications. In practice, the assembly has never dismissed or even publicly challenged a sitting supreme leader in its more than 40-year history.
The supreme leader position itself sits at the absolute center of Iran’s government structure. The office holder serves for life, commands the armed forces including the Revolutionary Guard Corps, oversees the judiciary, controls state media, and has final say over both foreign and domestic policy. It is, by design, the most powerful position in the country, more powerful than the elected president.
Background: A System Built to Filter Out Dissent
Candidates seeking a seat on the Assembly of Experts must first pass through the Guardian Council, a 12-member body of clerics and jurists, half of whom are directly appointed by the supreme leader himself. The Guardian Council vets every candidate for the assembly, disqualifying anyone it deems insufficiently aligned with the Islamic Republic’s governing establishment. Political scientist Farideh Farhi, who has studied the assembly extensively, has noted this creates a closed loop: the supreme leader effectively influences who gets to sit on the body constitutionally empowered to select his own successor.
This structure has been used before. In 2024, the Guardian Council excluded former President Hassan Rouhani, considered a relative moderate, from even running for an assembly seat. The result is a body that Brookings researchers and multiple Iran scholars describe as heavily weighted toward hardline and traditional conservative clerics, elected through a process that limits genuine political competition from the outset.
How the 2026 Succession Actually Unfolded
When Khamenei was killed on February 28, Iran’s constitution required an interim Leadership Council to temporarily assume his duties. That council initially included President Masoud Pezeshkian, Chief Justice Gholam-Hossein Mohseni-Eje’i, and Ayatollah Alireza Arafi, with Iran’s constitution requiring the Assembly of Experts to select a permanent successor “as soon as possible,” though without specifying a strict deadline.
What followed, according to reporting from Iran International, involved the Revolutionary Guard Corps applying direct pressure on Assembly of Experts members in the days before the vote, described as “repeated contacts and psychological and political pressure” aimed at securing support for Mojtaba Khamenei specifically. The assembly convened an emergency online session on March 3 and announced Mojtaba as the new supreme leader on March 8, roughly a week after his father’s death, making this only the second leadership transition in the Islamic Republic’s 47-year history, following Khomeini’s death in 1989.
Mojtaba’s selection required the same workaround used for his father decades earlier. Iran’s constitution technically requires a supreme leader to hold the religious rank of marja, a senior authority on Islamic law. Like his father before him, Mojtaba held only the lower rank of hojatoleslam at the time of his selection, meaning the assembly had to elevate his religious status specifically to accommodate the succession, a maneuver Iran used once before when Khamenei himself succeeded Khomeini in 1989.
Why It Matters
The speed and outcome of this succession, a son inheriting his father’s position within days, despite having no government experience and thin religious credentials, has reinforced longstanding criticism that Iran’s clerical succession system functions less as a genuine deliberative process and more as a mechanism for preserving continuity within a narrow, self-selecting elite. Scholar Farideh Farhi has argued the process “has never been free or transparent,” a characterization that predates this year’s events but was arguably reinforced by them.
Expert Analysis
Institutional impact: The Revolutionary Guard Corps’ reported role in pressuring Assembly members represents a significant data point for analysts studying where real power sits within Iran’s system. If accurate, it suggests the military and security apparatus, rather than the clerical establishment alone, may increasingly drive top leadership decisions.
Political impact: Mojtaba Khamenei’s complete absence from public view since being wounded in the same strike that killed his father raises questions about whether Iran currently has a functioning, publicly visible head of state at all, a highly unusual situation for a country actively engaged in sensitive negotiations with the United States.
Legitimacy impact: Iranian officials have explicitly framed public turnout at Khamenei’s funeral as a “referendum” on the regime’s legitimacy, a framing that inadvertently underscores how uncertain that legitimacy currently is, particularly following mass protests over inflation and currency collapse just weeks before Khamenei’s death.
Historical impact: This marks only the second time in the Islamic Republic’s history that the Assembly of Experts has actually exercised its core constitutional function, following the 1989 transition from Khomeini to Khamenei, meaning there is very little institutional precedent for how this kind of succession is supposed to unfold under pressure.
Statistics & Context
The Assembly of Experts has 88 members, elected by popular vote every eight years, with the current assembly’s term running from 2024 to 2032. Mojtaba Khamenei was announced as supreme leader nine days after his father’s death, on March 9, 2026. This is only the second supreme leader transition since the Islamic Republic’s founding in 1979, following the 1989 transition after Ayatollah Khomeini’s death.
What’s Next
With Khamenei’s state funeral concluding on July 9 in Mashhad, attention will likely shift to whether Mojtaba eventually appears publicly to assume full, visible leadership of the country, or whether his continued absence signals deeper uncertainty about his health or standing. How he manages Iran’s fragile negotiations with the United States over its nuclear program and the Strait of Hormuz, still ongoing at the time of his succession, will be an early test of his ability to actually govern rather than merely hold the title.
FAQ
What is the Assembly of Experts?
It is an 88-member body of Shia Islamic clerics, elected by Iranian voters every eight years, whose constitutional role is to select, monitor, and theoretically dismiss Iran’s supreme leader.
How did Mojtaba Khamenei become supreme leader so quickly?
The Assembly of Experts convened an emergency session days after his father’s death and announced Mojtaba as successor on March 9, 2026, roughly a week after Ali Khamenei was killed. Reporting from Iran International indicated the Revolutionary Guard Corps pressured assembly members ahead of the vote.
Is the Assembly of Experts truly independent?
Most Iran scholars say no. Candidates for the assembly must first be approved by the Guardian Council, half of whose members are appointed by the supreme leader himself, creating a closed loop that limits genuine political competition.
Did Mojtaba Khamenei meet the religious qualifications to become supreme leader?
Not initially. He held the lower clerical rank of hojatoleslam rather than the required marja status, requiring the assembly to elevate his religious rank specifically to accommodate his succession, the same workaround used for his father in 1989.
Has the Assembly of Experts ever removed a supreme leader?
No. In its more than 40-year history, the assembly has never dismissed or even publicly challenged a sitting supreme leader, despite holding the constitutional authority to do so.
Editorial Note: This article was prepared using publicly available information from international news organizations, academic research, and official sources available at the time of publication. Facts may be updated as authorities release new information.
Sources:
Trump
Trump Warns of “Communist Menace” at Mount Rushmore, Hours Before NYC Mayor Delivers Pointed Rebuttal on America’s 250th Birthday
Quick Summary
President Trump kicked off America’s 250th anniversary weekend with a speech at Mount Rushmore that veered from patriotic celebration into a stark warning about what he called a resurgent “communist menace” threatening the country, rhetoric historians noted broke sharply from the traditionally unifying tone past presidents have used for Independence Day. Hours earlier and hundreds of miles away, New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani delivered his own address from behind George Washington’s former desk, offering an implicit rebuttal centered on immigration and inclusion without ever naming the president directly.
What Happened
Speaking Friday evening at Mount Rushmore National Memorial in Keystone, South Dakota, Trump told the crowd that “communism is a mortal threat to American liberty,” calling it “the greatest threat to our country, including World War I, World War II, Pearl Harbor or even 9/11.” He continued, “there is now a resurgence of the communist menace in our land, including from newcomers to our country who embrace ideas totally opposed to our way of life and our great success.” The remarks were widely noted for their setting, a national park built specifically to honor four American presidents, and for breaking from the apolitical tone leaders like Gerald Ford and Ronald Reagan maintained during past milestone Independence Day addresses.
Earlier that same day in New York, Mayor Zohran Mamdani delivered what his office described as a “major address” marking the anniversary, speaking from City Hall while seated behind a desk that once belonged to George Washington and surrounded by recently naturalized US citizens waving American flags. Without naming Trump, Mamdani directly challenged the president’s framing of immigration: “For generation after generation, we have been told that when the world has sent its people to our shores, it has not sent its best.” He added, “America, they will tell you, belongs only to those with the right accent or the right shade of skin. The rest of us, they insist, should be grateful for merely being allowed to visit. How small they are. How weak, how unoriginal.”
Background
The dueling speeches arrived at a moment of unusual visibility for Mamdani, a Democrat who has increasingly positioned himself as a national foil to Trump’s immigration agenda. His address came the same week the Supreme Court upheld birthright citizenship, a ruling widely seen as a setback for the administration’s immigration priorities, and shortly after three House candidates he endorsed defeated incumbents in Democratic primaries.
Trump’s rhetoric, meanwhile, extended a pattern from recent weeks rather than representing an entirely new message; he had used similar language about communism in other speeches leading up to the anniversary. What made the Mount Rushmore remarks notable was not necessarily their content but their venue and timing, delivered at the ceremonial opening of a weekend built around national unity and historical reflection rather than contemporary partisan battles.
Why It Matters
The contrast between the two speeches captures a broader tension defining how America is marking this particular anniversary. According to an April survey from the Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research, only about 4 in 10 US adults said they felt “proud” about the country’s 250th anniversary, with roughly 3 in 10 describing themselves as “excited,” numbers that reflect a country marking a historic milestone while remaining deeply divided over its current direction. That divide was structural as much as rhetorical this year: Freedom 250, an organization aligned with the White House, organized much of the official activity in Washington, while America250, a bipartisan group founded by Congress a decade earlier, ran separate, competing events in cities including New York and Los Angeles.
Expert Analysis
Political impact: Trump’s willingness to deliver explicitly partisan remarks at a monument built to honor presidential legacy suggests a continued blurring of the line between ceremonial head-of-state functions and campaign-style messaging, a shift multiple outlets noted as a departure from historical precedent for the holiday.
Symbolic impact: Mamdani’s choice to speak from Washington’s former desk, flanked by newly naturalized citizens, was a deliberate visual counter-narrative to Trump’s immigration rhetoric, aimed at reclaiming the symbolism of the founding era for a competing political vision.
Public sentiment impact: The AP-NORC survey findings suggest that official commemorations, however elaborate, are landing on a public that remains split on how to feel about the country’s trajectory, with pride and excitement registering as minority sentiments rather than a broad national consensus.
Institutional impact: The existence of two separate, competing 250th anniversary organizing bodies, one aligned with the White House and one bipartisan and congressionally chartered, reflects how even the logistics of national commemoration have become subject to political fragmentation.
Statistics & Context
About 4 in 10 US adults reported feeling “proud” about America’s 250th anniversary, according to an AP-NORC survey conducted in April 2026, with roughly 3 in 10 saying “excited” described their emotions. Three House candidates endorsed by Mamdani won Democratic primaries the month before his address.
What’s Next
Both figures are likely to continue occupying opposite poles of the immigration debate heading into the 2026 midterms, with Mamdani’s growing national profile and Trump’s continued use of communism-focused rhetoric both expected to remain fixtures of the political landscape through the fall campaign season. How each message resonates with voters outside their respective bases may become clearer as midterm primary results continue rolling in through the summer.
FAQ
What did Trump say at Mount Rushmore?
He warned of a “communist menace” resurging in the United States, calling it a greater threat than World War I, World War II, Pearl Harbor, or the September 11 attacks, and linked the threat to “newcomers” to the country.
What did Mayor Mamdani say in his own address?
Speaking from New York City Hall, Mamdani did not name Trump directly but challenged rhetoric suggesting immigrants are not America’s “best,” delivering his remarks while surrounded by recently naturalized citizens.
Why were Trump’s remarks considered unusual for Independence Day?
Historically, presidents including Gerald Ford and Ronald Reagan delivered largely apolitical, unifying remarks during major Independence Day commemorations. Trump’s explicitly partisan warnings marked a departure from that tradition.
How do Americans feel about the 250th anniversary overall?
An AP-NORC survey found only about 4 in 10 adults felt “proud” and roughly 3 in 10 felt “excited” about the milestone, suggesting mixed and divided public sentiment.
Are there multiple organizations running America’s 250th anniversary events?
Yes. Freedom 250, aligned with the White House, organized much of the Washington programming, while America250, a bipartisan congressionally founded group, ran separate events including celebrations in New York and Los Angeles.
Editorial Note: This article was prepared using publicly available information from international news organizations and official sources available at the time of publication. Facts may be updated as authorities release new information.
Sources:
